|
Flat Panels
Rear-Projection TV Front Projectors Receivers HT in a Box Speakers Recently Added
Video Displays
All In One HT
Speakers
Sources
Electronics
Other Hardware
Custom Install
Software Hook Me Up HT Talks To Boot Camp Advice From the Experts Ask Home Theater Shane Buettner Mark Fleischmann Audio/Video News CEDIA 2009 CES 2009 CEDIA 2008 CES 2008 CEDIA 2007 HE 2007 CES 2007 CEDIA 2006 AV Links HT Galleries A/V Glossary Contact Us Customer Service New Subscription Digital HT Renew Give a Gift Sub Services Flatscreen TVs LCD TVs Plasma TVs HDTV AV Receivers Home Theater in a Box Digital Projectors DLP Projectors Video Projectors Surround Sound Dolby 5.1 |
Sony BRAVIA VPL-HW10 SXRD Projector:
In stark contrast to the other two projectors, it didn’t seem to matter where I pointed the remote when I wanted to adjust something. The remote is somewhat limited in its ability to jump to some of the image controls, but it covers the main bases, like brightness, contrast, and picture memories. The remote is also backlit, which makes it easy to use in the dark.
Video Processing
This was the only projector in this group without processing for constant-height setups. If you want to use this projector with an anamorphic lens, you’ll have to use an outboard video processor. Sony doesn’t include any type of frame rate creation for smoother film playback as it does in its higher-end models. But this didn’t bother me since I’m not a fan of that kind of processing.
In Use
The SXRD panels and dynamic iris delivered the best contrast performance of the group. Absolute blacks were a touch darker than the other two projectors and fell only slightly short of what we see from high-end designs at a much higher price point. However, there was a drawback. Like the other projectors, the VPL-HW10 suffered from a rather muted midrange with mixed material. This robs the image of dynamic punch when there is a large mix of black and white on the screen. If you haven’t lived with a high-dynamic-range projector before, you probably won’t even notice this. Unfortunately, I’ve been using one for quite some time now, and the difference was striking. The Sony was definitely the best of the bunch in this department, thanks to the higher native contrast of the SXRD panels compared with the LCD models. It offered a bit more snap in mixed-contrast scenes. One of the biggest issues I saw during my time with the Sony was the exaggeration of banding in HD images. This was very noticeable with animation. One of my favorite test clips for this is the tractor-tipping scene in Cars (Blu-ray). As Mater sneaks up on the unsuspecting tractor, the night sky has some very minor banding. This isn’t always evident on some playback devices. The VPL-HW10 exaggerated the issue and showed noticeable banding in the night sky. I rarely saw this in live-action features, but if you look for it, you’ll notice it more often than you would with some other designs. The Sony had better overall contrast and color than the Mitsubishi. But the Mitsubishi didn’t give up too much and added a little more detail to the image with its razor-sharp picture. I prefer the extra sharpness the Mitsubishi offers, but this Sony delivers a beautiful picture for the price. Others may prefer its overall balance of strengths, which are considerable.
Conclusion
Article Continues: Features & Connections »
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


The included remote is the best of the three tested here and offers the widest operating window.