|
Flat Panels
Rear-Projection TV Front Projectors Receivers HT in a Box Speakers Recently Added
Video Displays
All In One HT
Speakers
Sources
Electronics
Other Hardware
Custom Install
Software
HT Gamer Hook Me Up HT Talks To Boot Camp Advice From the Experts Shane Buettner Mark Fleischmann Audio/Video News CES 2008 CEDIA 2007 HE 2007 CES 2007 CEDIA 2006 Dealer Locator AV Links HT Galleries Cable Resources Hi-Rez Audio A/V Glossary Contact Us Customer Service Advertiser Index New Subscription Digital HT Renew Give a Gift Sub Services Flatscreen TVs LCD TVs Plasma TVs HDTV AV Receivers Home Theater in a Box Digital Projectors DLP Projectors Video Projectors Surround Sound Dolby 5.1 |
Pioneer Elite KURO PRO-110FD Plasma HDTV
Greatest flat panel ever. Forgive my dipping into hyperbole for the caption, but there really wasn't another way to go. It's not just the fact that the PRO-110FD creates a beautiful image. It's that the image it creates is such a step above every other flat panel on the market that it is not even comparable. There's that hyperbole again. I'll stop and let the performance speak for itself.
CEATEC 2006 Fast-forward to last summer. Pioneer had a name for this new leap in plasma technology, KURO, the Japanese word for black. The press conference for the production models of this new line amazingly had all the plasmas lit from behind. Could it be that they didn't want to show their plasmas in a totally dark room (a trick stolen from every LCD manufacturer)? Some of us, myself included, worried that the promise of this leap was watered down so that it was merely an incremental improvement. Manufacturing in large numbers tends to do that. So we waited.
Now At 4,020:1, the PRO-110FD's full-on/full-off contrast ratio is so good, it is nearly double that of the next best flat panel. Read that again. Double. This isn't an incremental improvement, as we've seen with all flat panels over the past few years. This is a marked jump. And that's comparing it with the best of the rest. If you take the average contrast ratio of current flat panels, it's three or four times better. The irony is that plasmas aren't supposed to have a good full-on/full-off contrast ratio; it's in their very design not to. I'll come back to that, as this still isn't the amazing part.
ANSI contrast ratio, which is the measurement of eight 100-percent-white and eight 0-percent-black squares arranged in a checkerboard pattern, provides a sort of worst-case scenario of what you'll see on the screen in terms of contrast ratio. The measured ANSI contrast of 3,239:1 is almost three times better than the best plasmas and most LCDs, and a full 50 percent better than the highest we've previously measured. And even all of that pales in comparison with this next measurement. All of these tests so far aren't even letting a plasma perform at its best. All plasmas have built-in limiters, so things like a 100-IRE full-white field won't cause the TV to melt. So their full-on/full-off numbers, at least how we measure them, are misleadingly low. This is why I always mention what a plasma can do on a 100-IRE window (roughly 25 percent of the screen), which is a more accurate representation of the contrast ratio you're seeing when you're watching TV or movies. LCDs don't need this test because they'll measure identical to their full-on/full-off numbers. That's just how they work. With this test-and this is what it looks like when you're watching actual video-the contrast ratio is 10,645:1. This is above and beyond any other flat panel on the market, by far. In fact, there are only a few displays of any type on the market that can boast this kind of contrast ratio without "dynamic" helpers such as irises or adjustable backlights, and all of them are front projectors. Even the vaunted CRT would find it difficult to beat this beast, as CRTs had notoriously bad ANSI contrast measurements (although, admittedly, the best had an immeasurably low black level).
How?
Article Continues: Page 2 »
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

